09:39:15 <randomresult> nehmen wir an, ich würde jetzt fluidcontent_bootrap migrieren zu den neuen flux:form geschichten... das würde ich doch in der dev branch machen oder?
09:41:07 <bjo3rn> yes, randomresult, you would do that in development branch ^^
09:49:41 <randomresult> i mean: i checkout the develep branch, make a new branch out of that, make the migration and create a PR
10:00:24 <randomresult> hopefully this was the right way...
10:01:55 * randomresult @bjo3rn, @danilobuerger, @NamelessCoder and @cedricziel (who is offline?!?) i finished that no-brainer migration to namespaces for fluidcontent-bootstrap
10:05:46 <bjo3rn> thanks randomresult. did you test it?
10:33:33 <randomresult> all looks good in the backend. but as soon as i add a page and/or a contentelement to my page i get a nesting error in the frontend.
12:06:54 <Guest|38823> Hi, can anyone tell me which combination of the extensions and their branches in Github would be most stable on a 6.2 beta2 installation?
12:07:06 <Guest|38823> I am looking to use fluidcontent_bootstrap
12:08:49 <Guest|38823> at the moment the bootstrap tab doesn't appear in the content element wizard, and when I choose to create a Fluid content element, the dropdown menu which lets me choose which template I want to use does not appear. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks.
16:24:34 <Guest|67712> hi there, i'm wondering if there is already a FAL implementation into fluidcontent_bootstrap somewhere ?
16:25:55 <Denyerec> cedricziel am I right in thinking that if she only used 1 or 2 fCEs, then even starting over from scratch with her entered content wouldn't be too much trouble ?
16:26:05 <Denyerec> As there would only be a couple of FCEs to recreate?
16:26:36 <Denyerec> I think most of her stuff is going to be text or text w/image anyway
16:26:40 <Denyerec> and they wouldn't be affected...
16:26:47 <cedricziel> Guest|67712: vhs and flux both have FAL capabilites (not TER, only git IIRC)
16:27:49 <cedricziel> Denyerec: you try to bring me into a difficult state of mind ^^
16:28:05 <cedricziel> IF she only uses bootstrap structural elements
16:28:14 <cedricziel> then all is good, just as you described it
16:28:37 <cedricziel> as soon, as more special elements are being used, you'll inevitably run into trouble
16:28:53 <cedricziel> but yes, the contents of the structural elements persist in any case
16:29:22 <cedricziel> so if you get her to the poing of forgetting fancyness and focus on wireframing-all is fine :)
16:29:28 <Denyerec> So if she uses a bunch of standard elements
16:29:36 <Denyerec> and just uses two-column from bootstrap custom FCE
16:29:44 <Denyerec> I shouldn' thave too much pain when I get back and build the site template...