IRC logs

20150826

Logs from channel #fedext on freenode - our official support channel.

IRC log range: 20150826*

20150826

  • 04:20:53 <MacPhil> you could redirect the php errors to a file
  • 04:22:13 <MacPhil> my webserver configuration is hidding the php white errors from my log :D so i set the above
  • 06:08:01 <potofcoffee> I think I figured it out. Looks like it was simply a timeout error with fcgi.
  • 09:04:01 <Defos> Hey lads! Can I access nested FCEs? e.g. I have a FCE which has one grid. In this grid I have multiple other FCEs. How do I access the flux elements of the inside FCE?
  • 09:05:38 <xaver> Defos: where do you want to access them?
  • 09:07:24 <Defos> In the outer (wrapping) template which has the single grid
  • 09:07:36 <Defos> template/FCE
  • 09:10:07 <xaver> you mean soemthing like this https://github.com/bootstraptheme-for-typo3/fluidbootstraptheme/blob/development/Resources/Private/Templates/Content/Row.html
  • 09:10:26 <xaver> this is dynamic
  • 09:11:04 <xaver> <flux:content.render area="columnNumberTwo" />
  • 09:12:17 <featdd> hay, is it possible to run multiple provider extensions on a multi domain site without conflicts?
  • 09:21:50 <Defos> @xaver: not quite, as this FCE is nesting the elements itself. I am nesting FCEs in itself. So two Typo3 FCE nested.
  • 09:22:53 <Defos> So it is using a single Typo3 content element. I am using two or more, which are nested.
  • 09:38:51 <xaver> featdd: should be possible
  • 09:39:24 <xaver> Defos: take a look with f:debug() should be nexted and possible with a loo[p
  • 09:39:58 <featdd> xaver: hoped to find someone tried it out but I think it should work too
  • 09:40:16 <xaver> featdd: i used already 2 provider in 1 tree
  • 09:40:33 <xaver> unique names should be fine
  • 09:42:16 <xaver> featdd: only problem in future is maybe the mixing of content elements
  • 09:42:30 <featdd> okay thx, situation for me changed anyway
  • 09:42:38 <featdd> mkay
  • 09:43:17 <xaver> in wizard it is mixed - use same order in element select and not based on provider
  • 09:43:56 <xaver> you would need to split it yourself, but i would improve to build your default provider and mix is with a individual one
  • 10:32:52 <arnekolja> I read that TYPO3 CMS 7.5 or 7.6 will provide Fluid based content elements as core functionality. What does this mean for fluidcontent_core? Will it get dropped, or does it serve a complexer purpose?
  • 10:34:06 <xaver> arnekolja: depends on implementation - put i think it will will be continued. But we use core tables - should be no problem to switch
  • 10:34:37 <arnekolja> okay. I'm looking forward to seeing it in action :)
  • 10:34:38 <xaver> nested content is something else - we would like to use a nativ core feature, if it is useable in all cases...
  • 10:34:58 <arnekolja> you mean like fces with grids?
  • 10:35:17 <xaver> you can remove csc and install fcc - image with text is missing
  • 10:35:54 <xaver> yes, or also accordion. 1 wrapper and content elements inside
  • 10:35:56 <arnekolja> yeah, but missing image with text is quite a problem for editors who are used to it. tried it and failed communicating it :D
  • 10:36:29 <xaver> most webs are responsive and text with image is horror - create needed elements as FCE
  • 10:36:30 <arnekolja> yes, I think the timeframe wont allow it to make the first iteration an overall solution
  • 10:36:41 <xaver> it is tested and optimized without 1000 options
  • 10:37:07 <arnekolja> i know you're right … just fighting with the agency-internal editors.
  • 10:37:14 <xaver> you can't test everything in image with test
  • 10:37:23 <arnekolja> dont know right now … but image+text can be hidden, right?
  • 10:38:13 <xaver> i build an FCE Contact with image and text or Product image and text
  • 10:38:39 <xaver> i git it should be hiddden, i don't know if it was released
  • 10:38:39 <arnekolja> btw, is there a performance "problem" with fcc? i noticed that pages containing multiply nested fces with images caused two installations to load the affected page for a looong time (pages module in BE)
  • 10:38:58 <arnekolja> okay@git
  • 10:39:30 <xaver> fcc is not nested - should be faster - less TS
  • 10:40:04 <arnekolja> i mean i had fces with grids and those grids containing images added via fcc
  • 10:40:46 <xaver> depends on cache and some other stuff - we added new caches few months ago
  • 10:40:56 <arnekolja> e.g. a four-column grid, each col containing a two column grid with text in the one and image in the other column. that about 10 to 15 times and the page loaded around 20 seconds in BE
  • 10:41:07 <xaver> if you have a testable reasonable performance issue - report it :)
  • 10:41:49 <arnekolja> okay. maybe i'll reconsider using fcc again :) it's so great in theory, but i failed on image+text and performance a few months ago. maybe it is better now :)
  • 10:42:32 <arnekolja> image+text shouldnt be a problem if its hidden. so i'll check current versions and/or permissions for that
  • 10:43:02 <arnekolja> i'm also a fan of providing specific fces instead of offering each possible combination via generic elements.