09:49:03 <braguzz> Call to undefined method Tx_Fluidpages_Provider_PageConfigurationProvider::getGrid() in on line 97
09:50:06 <BenjaminR> doesnt that sound like the error you discussed with me, NamelessCoder and cedricziel last week? and didnt one conclude you dont use fluidpages templates. wasnt it EXT:speciality?
09:51:27 <braguzz> an older version that I personalized
09:52:30 <BenjaminR> yap what is not compatible with EXT:fluidpages and EXT:flux
09:52:39 <BenjaminR> you will have to recreate your templates according to our guidline
09:53:18 <braguzz> could you tell me the differences that I try to do it?
09:53:49 <braguzz> Ps. switching to 6.0.3 also the backend doesnt work
09:54:08 <BenjaminR> you can change to whatever - your speciality template wont work with our exts :)
09:54:56 <BenjaminR> fetch fluidpages_bootstrap and have a look at the page templates located in Resources/Private/Templates/Page/xxx.html
09:56:58 <braguzz> it is normat that also the backend doesnt work?
09:57:05 <braguzz> it is normal that also the backend doesnt work?
10:00:16 <BenjaminR> sure - because fluidpages parses the grid given in the template file and builds the backend layout according to it. if there is no grid present (like in yours) no be layout can be build
10:11:28 <BenjaminR> important here: page template contains layout declaration, configuration section and a section that is rendered in layout (here: Content Section)
10:28:45 <randomresult> i just read a news about flux and there is mentioned, that i need to run the updatescript for that... i am on t3 6.2 and i cant find that in the extensionmanager... where is it?
10:29:20 <braguzz> for example this partial doesnt work http://pastebin.com/R8fgqHXm
10:38:50 <Guest|43316> Using the bootstrap package, when copying a content element from one page to another, it's always copied and additionally cut from the ressource page
10:48:59 <randomresult> im using the latest versions of flux dev-branch from github
10:49:01 <Guest|43316> I'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with T3 or flux in general. I have several T3 6.1.7 installations using fedext and everythings fine
11:57:44 <BenjaminR> check server logs and typo3 log
11:57:46 <Guest|43316> when I update flux using the em, I got message "Fixes and performance. Note: new colPos value - RUN NEW EXTENSION UPGRADE SCRIPT IMMEDIATELY AFTER UPDATING!"
11:58:03 <Guest|43316> after updating T3 is completely 500
12:32:52 <randomresult> what would u prefer? sass or less?
12:37:26 <randomresult> what permissions would you give inside my typo3_src folder?
12:37:36 <randomresult> u think 755 is a good option?
13:25:52 <braguzz> what does unlink(FLUIDCONTENT_TEMPFILE); do?
13:27:29 <BenjaminR> there is a tempfile (.FED_CONTENT in typo3temp) which is needed for the content wizard in be to show up which content elements can be used
13:27:41 <BenjaminR> unlink removes it before its rewritten
13:29:07 <braguzz> it is the line that slow the empty cache process
13:31:11 <braguzz> I mean if I remove that line emptying cache is fast
13:41:47 <braguzz> the 'problem' is writeCachedConfigurationIfMissing()
13:59:30 <randomresult> i have this in my installtool : Class 'Tx_Fluid_Core_Parser_SyntaxTree_TextNode' not found in /html/typo3/typo3conf/ext/view/Classes/Override/Parser/SyntaxTree/ExtendedViewHelperNode.php on line 86
14:07:48 <braguzz> my problem is that writeCachedConfigurationIfMissing() is really slow
14:08:13 <braguzz> I'll restart to think at that on monday
14:12:11 <ndee> I have currently a <f:form> with the method="GET", is there a way to get rid of all those nasty looking GETvars when I submit the form? The only way would be to move to just <form> I guess
14:49:39 <BenjaminR> braguzz: the more fces you have the longer this process takes - and you use fluidcontent-bootstrap which contains a looot of fces. in production you wont have so many i guess.
14:49:48 <BenjaminR> anyway i dont see the problem here :)
14:50:08 <BenjaminR> cache shouldnt be smth you clear every minute.
14:50:43 <BenjaminR> ndee: this is a question for #typo3 i guess - not for #fedext :) anyway i already answered it :)
14:51:20 <ndee> BenjaminR: I just thought there might be more extbase people in here but true, I think I have to get rid of <f:form> :/
14:55:27 <randomresult> one question : is view compatible with typo3 6.2
15:37:59 <vistainteractive> When using <v:content.render as="contentElements">, the {contentElements} array consists of one item with the pre-rendered content and not an item for each individual field of the content element
15:38:25 <vistainteractive> Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong?
15:39:02 <vistainteractive> Using vhs TER version 1.8.4
15:46:00 <vistainteractive> My code http://pastebin.com/iX8dMAEa
16:39:37 <mrboe-> @vistainteractive i have this solution <f:for each="{accordionitems}" as="item" iteration="iter">
18:25:51 <randomresult> NamelessCoder recently postet a link where a providerextension could be downloaded from fedext by simply entering a link in the browser
23:48:44 <Guest|13665> I need advice. Should jump onboard with the bootstrap demo, or just use the extensions stand alone? I want to make a long term decision since I have about 50 client websites I'd be porting since it appears Templavoila is on the way out.