Documentation
Library
Community
Donate
Blog
IRC logs
Community
Activity feeds
Mentions
Support Chat
IRC logs
IRC logs
20150227
Logs from channel #fedext on freenode - our official support channel.
2016-10
2016-09
2016-08
2016-07
2016-06
2016-05
2016-04
2016-03
2016-02
2016-01
2015-12
2015-11
2015-10
2015-09
2015-08
2015-07
2015-06
2015-05
2015-04
2015-03
2015-02
2015-01
2014-12
2014-11
2014-10
2014-09
2014-08
2014-07
2014-06
2014-05
2014-04
2014-03
2014-02
2014-01
2013-12
2013-11
IRC log range: 20150227*
20150227
03:43:40
<rahulthewall> Good morning guys, does “classCurrent” not work if I use manual rendering for menu in Fluid? (It’s not working for me)
04:55:37
<rahulthewall> Any ideas NamelessCoder and bjo3rn (sorry for tagging)
04:59:02
<cedricziel> how would it work, rahulthewall?
04:59:19
<cedricziel> as you said-you render manual. that basically means you're in charge
04:59:46
<rahulthewall> Hmm, that makes sense
04:59:52
<cedricziel> ;)
05:00:04
<rahulthewall> so … how would I add a currentClass in this case?
05:00:42
<rahulthewall> There must be a better solution that using JS to check the URL and then add a class to the relevant menu item
05:00:56
<cedricziel> {page.uid} == {menuItem.uid}
05:03:40
<rahulthewall> Sorry, didn’t really understand that - could you expand a little
05:03:49
<cedricziel> oh.
05:04:19
<cedricziel> well, i didnt use them in a while, but there are several properties on the menuItem
05:05:46
<cedricziel> when you're looping your, you can use {menuPage -> f:debug()}
05:08:25
<rahulthewall> Right, let me take a look
05:09:12
<cedricziel> https://github.com/FluidTYPO3/vhs/blob/development/Classes/ViewHelpers/Page/Menu/AbstractMenuViewHelper.php#L210
05:09:35
<cedricziel> you have several properties you can compare against in conditions and add classes accordingly
05:13:02
<Xatenev> Heya, anybody very familiar with backend layouts?^^
05:13:13
<cedricziel> sure, which ones? ^^
05:13:34
<Xatenev> well i got one typo3 normal backend layout with 3 columns , and one with 1 column
05:13:45
<Xatenev> but when i wanna switch, it doesnt show content anymore :|^^
05:14:02
<Xatenev> like the old content is still there when i switch the backend layout, its just not showing anymore in the backend
05:14:08
<Xatenev> but the references aren't getting deleted
05:14:10
<cedricziel> so no fluidpages, right?
05:14:25
<Xatenev> fluid is used
05:14:32
<Xatenev> i got backend layouts, then i save the columns into variables
05:14:36
<Xatenev> and give them to my fluid template
05:14:37
<Xatenev> ^^
05:15:21
<cedricziel> cool; right-the backend layouts need the same colPos'es of course
05:15:57
<Xatenev> well my old had 4 columns
05:16:00
<Xatenev> i just need one now though
05:16:14
<cedricziel> they need the same colPos numbers in their definition
05:16:21
<cedricziel> otherwise they would just get hidden
05:16:27
<Xatenev> well but for example:
05:16:32
<cedricziel> can you gist your Layouts?
05:16:36
<Xatenev> its siple
05:16:39
<cedricziel> no paste pls
05:16:40
<Xatenev> 1 row 1 column with colpos = 0
05:16:41
<Xatenev> :p
05:16:46
<Xatenev> is my new layout
05:16:52
<Xatenev> but when i add new contnet to that column
05:16:57
<Xatenev> its juts not shown lol
05:17:06
<Xatenev> even though colPos = 0 and i use content < styles.content.get
05:17:20
<cedricziel> once again
05:17:26
<cedricziel> so it's not about the backend?
05:17:34
<cedricziel> it's about the frontend output
05:17:38
<Xatenev> well i dont know actually where the problem is
05:17:39
<cedricziel> right?
05:17:44
<Xatenev> probably its the FE output
05:17:51
<Xatenev> ya
05:17:54
<cedricziel> k
05:18:15
<cedricziel> then you need to show me your PAGE object definition
05:18:26
* Xatenev doin
05:19:02
<Xatenev> http://pastebin.com/pEaZ27Dq
05:19:17
<Xatenev> quite standard, its actually only about the content < styles.content.get part
05:19:23
<Xatenev> all other variables dont matter
05:19:54
<cedricziel> hey. did you include css_styled_content before that?
05:20:18
<Xatenev> no idea
05:20:23
<Xatenev> isnt that included automatically?
05:20:28
<cedricziel> ehm. no
05:20:30
<cedricziel> ^^
05:20:43
<Xatenev> dont find css_styled_content in my setup atleast
05:20:51
<Xatenev> but when i use getLeft it finds content
05:20:54
<cedricziel> you need to include csc in order to be able to use styles.*
05:20:56
<Xatenev> so I dont think its about that
05:21:10
<Xatenev> getLeft finds some weird content
05:21:13
<Xatenev> lol
05:21:29
<Xatenev> backend layouts arae just so horrible designed ><^^
05:21:43
<cedricziel> this has nothing to do with backendlayouts
05:21:50
<cedricziel> did you debug your {content} variable?
05:21:55
<Xatenev> yop
05:22:04
<Xatenev> '' (0 chars)
05:23:13
<Xatenev> no idea where the problem could be actually, did the same in like idk, 30 projects before? worked always
05:23:55
<cedricziel> sure. that's why i insist ^^
05:24:49
<Xatenev> idk everything seems correct
05:24:52
<Xatenev> colpos = 0
05:24:58
<Xatenev> styles.content.get retrieves column 0
05:26:05
* Xatenev hates typo3
05:26:06
<Xatenev> ><
05:26:25
<cedricziel> can you, nevertheless please post your backendlayout definition?
05:26:45
<Xatenev> on it
05:27:06
<Xatenev> http://pastebin.com/MDaXQGXx
05:28:03
<Xatenev> i will do a db check right now
05:28:13
<Xatenev> btw there are some weird relations going on or msth
05:30:56
<Xatenev> cedricziel: seems correct no?^^
05:31:03
<cedricziel> sorry, was away
05:32:00
<cedricziel> seems okay
05:32:12
<cedricziel> and you're sure it's selected on that very page?
05:32:42
<Xatenev> yop
05:32:47
<cedricziel> hmm. great
05:32:50
<cedricziel> ^^
05:32:55
<Xatenev> naa
05:32:55
<Xatenev> :P
05:32:58
<cedricziel> no clue then
05:33:10
<Xatenev> Typo3 is just so retarded in some points ><^^
05:33:17
<cedricziel> like you said, it should have worked that way a 1000 times
05:33:21
<Xatenev> yep
05:33:32
<cedricziel> flexibility often comes with complexity.
05:35:09
<Xatenev> i will update my reference index now
05:35:17
<Xatenev> I think its cause i got weird relations but i dunno
05:35:45
<cedricziel> but in general-yes. i'm shocked at this very moment about the state of multilanguage in extbase
05:44:36
<rahulthewall> hey cedricziel, could you take a look at this snippet: http://pastebin.com/abZKynBC
05:44:49
<rahulthewall> f:if condition="{item.uid.isCurrent}" does not evaluate to true
05:45:02
<cedricziel> item.isCurrent
05:46:55
<cedricziel> debug {item} and you'll see the properties
05:49:25
<rahulthewall> Big time noob question, if I run a f:debug{item} in the loop where do I see the output
05:49:28
<rahulthewall> of debug
05:50:24
<Xatenev> at the top of ur page normally
05:50:26
<Xatenev> .p
05:52:01
<rahulthewall> :P
05:57:54
<rahulthewall> right, that debug shows that current => TRUE (so isCurrent should return true)
05:57:59
<rahulthewall> I have this code snippet
05:58:58
<rahulthewall> in fact here is the complete partial: http://pastebin.com/A1pvtTvK
05:59:32
<rahulthewall> look from lines 73-82
06:00:06
<rahulthewall> instead of getting <li class=“ialActive”> I get <li>
06:03:38
<rahulthewall> nevermind, I need to learn to read the properties
06:03:42
<rahulthewall> it is current and not isCurrent
06:03:44
<rahulthewall> works :)
06:03:51
<rahulthewall> thanks cedricziel and Xatenev
06:04:23
<Xatenev> cedricziel: I think my typo3 will explode in a second
06:04:29
<Xatenev> its updating the reference index for like 1 hour now
06:04:29
<Xatenev> Xd
06:04:46
<cedricziel> that's a good sign
06:06:08
<Xatenev> ye btu i dont have so much time
06:06:13
<Xatenev> i got school for the next 2 weeks ><
06:06:19
<Xatenev> wanted to get that typo3 update done today :X
06:08:28
<cedricziel> what version are you on?
06:10:48
<Xatenev> 629
06:10:53
<Xatenev> @cedricziel
06:11:32
<cedricziel> just curious ;)
06:11:39
<cedricziel> alright, i'm away now as well
08:17:43
<Xatenev> cedricziel: u here?
14:24:21
<Denyerec> xaver - horrible "Wait until 7.2" bugs ?
14:27:16
<xaver> Denyerec: ?
14:28:10
<Denyerec> Re: 7.1
14:28:22
<Denyerec> [23:02] <xaver> 7.1 is broken anyway. horrible bugs...
14:30:45
<xaver> Denyerec: i don't use 7.x productive anyways
14:30:58
<Denyerec> I guessed you wouldn't ;)