09:46:23 <shaggz> I'm using flux 6.0.2 and get sometime following error: Core: Error handler (FE): PHP Warning: DOMDocument::load(): Start tag expected, '<' not found in .../typo3conf/ext/mytest/Resources/Private/Language/locallang.xml, line: 2 in .../typo3conf/ext/flux/Classes/Core/ViewHelper/AbstractFlexformViewHelper.php line 232
09:47:48 <shaggz> The problem is that the locallang.xml is overwritten but only with the xml tag and the rest is empty
09:52:10 <randomresult> @bjo3rn did u hear him saying something?
10:04:12 <randomresult> it belongs to which extension?
10:04:16 <Denyerec> Well, depends. There's being arty, and there's knowing how Photoshops memory architecture works so you can structure things accordingly.
10:06:03 <bjo3rn> Denyerec he's doing it right I can assure. only those composings are that big. the source fotos are taken at real high resolutions also.
10:40:55 <randomresult> what does this tell me Fatal error: Call to a member function getSingle() on a non-object in /Users/glatz/Sites/biestmilch2014/typo3conf/ext/flux/Classes/ViewHelpers/Be/ContentAreaViewHelper.php on line 75
10:42:44 <randomresult> help @bjo3rn @danilobuerger
10:43:06 <danilobuerger> that you didnt clear all caches properly
10:43:45 <randomresult> fuck - forgot this on local environment... live is completely empty
12:37:06 <randomresult> after updating, all my grids are empty. well ... 50% of it
12:37:53 <randomresult> i had the copy and paste --> I have 2 of the same CEs (Same Id diffrent position) this mornign and updated to 6.2.2 and the new flux-dev
13:07:31 <randomresult> when i edit an element and save it ...
13:07:32 <danilobuerger> there is only one single command missing and thats pasteAfter
13:07:53 <danilobuerger> everything else should work
13:08:30 <randomresult> well... im on 77ce079ba9e3d641c162ba52e87d0879694b0cc1 now
13:08:49 <randomresult> and when i edit an element, and save it... i shows up 2 times
13:11:14 <randomresult> danilobuerger when i checkout the latest dev-branch, in most of my grids the ce's are gone. they are still in list view but not in the grids.
13:28:16 <danilobuerger> you will have to update to the latest dev version as there are fixes in flux dev that depend on fluidpages having those fixes too
13:54:54 <danilobuerger> so what commit are you on now?
13:58:31 <Tjark> hi, strange Bug within flux:field.inline.fal. Everytime i add more than 53 (!) Images i get a the following error Message (Validating the security token of this form has failed. Please reload the form and submit it again.)
13:58:53 <danilobuerger> Tjark thats not a strange bug, but a misconfiguration
15:37:07 <NamelessCoder> specific and more performant variant of f:if (but it is not a condition as such)
15:39:02 <floxx1> i think livefilter on fluidtypo3.org is broken: if i type e.g. meta - it finds…nothing http://fluidtypo3.org/viewhelpers/vhs/development.html
16:30:02 <danilobuerger> however dom traversel up has very good performance support across all browsers because thats what always happens if you have chained selectors in css
16:31:42 <floxx1> link.parentsUntil('.root').show(); should do the trick
16:32:20 <danilobuerger> personally i think parents() will be fine performance wise
16:35:12 <floxx1> i would go for parentsUntil() ;)
16:36:29 <danilobuerger> if the filter is near the root, parents() will be faster by a magnitude since it doesnt have to compare the selector on every parent
16:57:55 <floxx1> however - both solutions solve the problem
17:37:12 <benjamin_654> to go up in the dom tree its: closest() ..
17:37:47 <benjamin_654> up (for me) is into root direction (:
17:56:24 <benjamin_654> this is the first time i use page configuration (fluidpages). how can i prevent inheritance? i did flux:flexform.field.checkbox inherit="0" - but this does not work ..
18:00:10 <cedricziel> once a flexform inherited values, it wont revert
18:01:07 <bjo3rn> inheritance is a little wonky atm.
18:01:41 <bjo3rn> btw. +1 from me for benjamin_654's closest()
18:04:03 <benjamin_654> i tried changing the namen, its still inheriting ):
18:07:41 * bjo3rn is trying to understand the inheritance logic in AbstractProvider
18:09:06 <bjo3rn> it seems inherit="0" is not taken into account atm?
18:18:08 <Outdoorsman> @NamelessCoder, just thought I'd mention the merge that's waiting to happen here: https://github.com/FluidTYPO3/flux/issues/546#issuecomment-42172591
18:22:49 <cedricziel> Outdoorsman: there's no open Pull Request. danilobuerger will open one when he's convinced his solution fits the case.
18:23:50 <danilobuerger> cedricziel i am convinced ;-)
18:24:31 <Outdoorsman> Ahhh... sorry about that, I'm still getting used to the GIT workflow so didn't think to check that.
18:28:14 <Outdoorsman> I'll move to that one until I see a merge. I have a major presentation to a client today and I've been holding off for a solution to this issue.